Texas Ups Its Calcium and Downs Its Antacids

New studies reveal that one's source of calcium maysources showed clear advantages. Of 168 Caucasian,
be just as important, or more so, as the totalpostmenopausal women, those who received half of
amount of calcium ingested. In fact, women whotheir calcium from food showed the highest total
consumed less calcium, but got it from food sources,calcium intake (an average of 1,620 mg a day) and
had a higher bone density than those who receivedthe highest bone density, as compared with those
at least 70% of their calcium from supplements.who received at least 70% of their calcium from
This came as news to many in Texas, with highsupplements, or "most" of their calcium from dietary
levels of chronic disease, and who have been told forsources.
years that a quality calcium supplement worked justThose who received three-quarters of their calcium
as well as food sources -- sometimes better. Spinach,from supplements took in an average of 1,030 mg a
for instance, while containing calcium, exhibits certainday, but actually showed lower bone density than
properties that inhibit the absorption of the nutrient.individuals who received most of their calcium (an
It's difficult for patients to know which foods do, andaverage of 830 mg a day) from food.
do not, deliver calcium effectively; such a guessingFor a study to reveal that lower levels of calcium
game is not an issue with quality supplements. Healthintake, received from dietary sources, appears to be
insurance companies, to yogurt lovers alike, couldn'tmore beneficial for bone density than higher levels of
be happier with this new research, however. Naturalthe nutrient received from supplements is a
sources of nutrients are not only usually lesstremendous revelation for the Western medical
expensive than prescriptions intended to inhibit boneworld. While the natural health community has been
loss -- necessary for many, but particularly for thosearguing this point for decades, the implication is that
who are not obtaining or absorbing proper levels offrom what source one obtains this nutrient -- as well
calcium -- but also don't require health coverage toas others, perhaps - is actually more important than
obtain.simply ingesting concentrated milligrams of it due to
The standard recommendation for calciumthe process of absorption. What good is a
consumption is 1,200 mg a day for young women,supplement, after all, if it's not properly assimilated?
and 1,500 mg a day for those who areThe issue is complicated, but at least in terms of
postmenopausal, preferably in combination withcalcium, it may have something to do with estrogen.
vitamin D. For supplements, this translates to 500 mg,Estrogen plays an important role in bone health, and
taken three times daily, for maximum absorption. Theprevious studies have shown that higher levels of
only mainstream controversy until now has been thecalcium are linked with greater bone density and
quality of the nutrient source. Toxic levels of lead andincreased estrogen product breakdown in the urine.
other metals have been linked with unrefined calciumThis leads to questions about the sources of calcium,
from oyster shell, bone meal, and dolomite that didand their affect on bone density. Recent studies
not legally meet the standards required to display thehave also linked particular antioxidants with bone
USP symbol, or were considered "purified."density levels.
Calcium supplements are also the most effectiveFor women at the greatest risk of osteoporosis --
when taken with food, as the "slow gastric emptyinggenerally postmenopausal, Caucasian women with
following a meal optimizes calcium absorption." Theslight frames -- this is big news. Newer, simpler
acids released by the body after eating aids in themedications aimed at preventing bone loss have hit
somewhat difficult assimilation of the nutrient. Thosethe market with tremendous force as the country's
who do not take their supplement with food, then,population (particularly "baby boomers") ages, and
are likely to experience fewer of the beneficialnutrient levels in mass-produced food continues to go
effects. Similarly, regular antacid takers have beendown. But, for once, this may translate into good
shown to be at higher risk for hip fractures. (Watchnews. After all, what better excuse is there to eat
out Austin, Dallas, and Houston -- relieving yourice cream?
heartburn after consuming all thoseBeing aware of how nutrients work in your body,
gourmet-prepared hot chili peppers just may affectand how they work best, is just one part of taking
your bones.)care of your health. How you take care of yourself
But a study released in May of this year by thewill certainly affect you as you age, and eventually
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition revealed thatyour wallet, as well.
receiving at least half of one's calcium from dietary